Romano Frantzen vs Botic Van De Zandschulp, Alkmaar 2015, Qualifying R2

FUTURES · Qualifying R2 · Clay

Final

Romano Frantzen

LostRank #1873

Zandschulp won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 16–0

Set 22–6

Set 31–6

Botic Van De Zandschulp

WinnerRank #37

Venue

Tennisvereniging De Hout

Alkmaar, NED· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

5 m

Sea level

Head to head

0Frantzen

1Zandschulp

1 meeting

AlkmaarQualifying R2 · 2015ClayThis match
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Sets won: 2Set 1: 0Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Romano Frantzen
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 1

Form and path

Romano Frantzen0–5

AlkmaarThis week

WQualifying R1
Romano Frantzen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jannik Roettlingsberger
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

AntalyaClay

LQualifying R2
Tomislav Jotovski
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Romano Frantzen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4

AntalyaHard

LQualifying R1
Goran Markovic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Romano Frantzen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 3

Rennes CHHard

LQualifying R1
Romain Jouan
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Romano Frantzen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6²Set 2: 1

NeversClay

LQualifying R1
Louis Lechevretel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Romano Frantzen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

RotterdamClay

LRound of 32
Gianni Mina
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 5Set 3: 7⁸
Romano Frantzen
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 7Set 3: 6⁶

Botic Van De Zandschulp2–4

Paris MastersHard

LRound of 64
Ugo Humbert
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6⁹Set 3: 6
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 7¹¹Set 3: 3

BaselHard

LRound of 32
Alex Michelsen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 3

BrusselsHard

LRound of 32
Clement Chidekh
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Shanghai MastersHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Romano Frantzen vs Botic Van De Zandschulp, Alkmaar 2015, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research