Rafael Jodar vs Botic Van De Zandschulp, Shanghai Masters 2026, Round of 16
Final score
Final
Jodar won in 3 sets · 2h 30m
2–1
Set 16–74
Set 26–4
Set 36–2
Venue and conditions
Qizhong Forest Sports City Tennis CenterShanghai, CHNStadium Court
Outdoor hardCourt speed0.2 vs last year104.7Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsClear
Set statistics
Final statisticsService
4Aces6
2Double faults6
67/9571%1st serve %59%60/102
26/2893%2nd serve %86%36/42
47/6770%1st serve points won67%40/60
18/2864%2nd serve points won48%20/42
1/250%Break points saved56%5/9
15Service games played15
Return
20/6033%1st serve return points30%20/67
22/4252%2nd serve return points36%10/28
4/944%Break points converted50%1/2
15Return games played15
Points
107Total points won90
65Service points won60
42Receiver points won30
5Max points in a row5
Games
18Games won13
14Service games won11
3Max games in a row2
0Tiebreaks1
Point by point
Jodar6
Van De Zandschulp2
015151530154015
P2 · Ace
Jodar5
Van De Zandschulp2
1501515301530304030
Jodar4
Van De Zandschulp2
0151515301530304030
Jodar3
Van De Zandschulp2
150151515301540
Jodar3
Van De Zandschulp1
15030030154015
Jodar2
Van De Zandschulp1
015151515301540
P1 · AceP2 · Double faultP3 · Ace
Jodar2
Van De Zandschulp0
150300301530304030
P4 · Double fault
Jodar1
Van De Zandschulp0
150300301530304030404040A4040A40
P1 · Double fault
Jodar6
Van De Zandschulp4
150300400401540304040A404040A404040A40
P4 · Double fault
Jodar5
Van De Zandschulp4
015030040
Jodar5
Van De Zandschulp3
150151530154015
Jodar4
Van De Zandschulp3
150300400
Jodar3
Van De Zandschulp3
0151515153030303040404040A
Jodar3
Van De Zandschulp2
015030040
P3 · Ace
Jodar3
Van De Zandschulp1
015151530154015
Jodar2
Van De Zandschulp1
015030153015403040404040A
Jodar2
Van De Zandschulp0
1503004004015
Jodar1
Van De Zandschulp0
15015153015401540304040A40
Jodar6
Van De Zandschulp7
1020212223333435364647
Jodar6
Van De Zandschulp6
01503004015403040
Jodar6
Van De Zandschulp5
150300400
Jodar5
Van De Zandschulp5
1501515153015403040
P2 · AceP5 · Double fault
Jodar5
Van De Zandschulp4
015151530154015
Jodar4
Van De Zandschulp4
01515151530303030404040A404040A40404040A
Jodar4
Van De Zandschulp3
150151530154015
Jodar3
Van De Zandschulp3
015030153015403040
P1 · Ace
Jodar3
Van De Zandschulp2
150300400
Jodar2
Van De Zandschulp2
0151515153015403040
Jodar2
Van De Zandschulp1
1503003015401540304040A404040A40
P1 · Ace
Jodar1
Van De Zandschulp1
0151515153015403040
P2 · Double fault
Jodar1
Van De Zandschulp0
015151530154015
P4 · Ace
Head to head
1Jodar
0Zandschulp
1 meeting- Shanghai MastersRound of 16 · 14 OctHardThis matchRafael JodarSets won: 2Set 1: 64Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 2
Form and path
Rafael Jodar0–3
Shanghai MastersThis week
TokyoHard
Botic Van De Zandschulp2–1
Shanghai MastersThis week
- WRound of 32Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Arthur FilsSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4
- WRound of 64Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Alex MichelsenSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WRound of 128Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Daniel MeridaSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 4
BeijingHard
- LRound of 32Francisco CerundoloSets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 3
- WQualifying R2Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jie CuiSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R1Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Valentin RoyerSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.