Arthur Fils vs Botic Van De Zandschulp, Shanghai Masters 2026, Round of 32
Final score
Final
Zandschulp won in 2 sets · 1h 39m
0–2
Set 15–7
Set 24–6
Venue and conditions
Qizhong Forest Sports City Tennis CenterShanghai, CHNGrandstand 2
Outdoor hardCourt speed0.2 vs last year104.7Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsPartly cloudy
Set statistics
Final statisticsService
6Aces6
0Double faults3
34/6255%1st serve %63%45/72
28/28100%2nd serve %89%24/27
22/3465%1st serve points won78%35/45
16/2857%2nd serve points won44%12/27
3/650%Break points saved89%8/9
11Service games played11
Return
10/4522%1st serve return points35%12/34
15/2756%2nd serve return points43%12/28
1/911%Break points converted50%3/6
11Return games played11
Points
63Total points won71
38Service points won47
25Receiver points won24
9Max points in a row7
Games
9Games won13
8Service games won10
2Max games in a row3
Point by point
Fils4
Van De Zandschulp6
0151515153030304030404040A404040A
P3 · Ace
Fils4
Van De Zandschulp5
1501515153030304030
Fils3
Van De Zandschulp5
150151515301540
Fils3
Van De Zandschulp4
01503004015403040
P5 · Ace
Fils3
Van De Zandschulp3
1501515153030303040
P3 · Ace
Fils3
Van De Zandschulp2
150300400
Fils2
Van De Zandschulp2
150300400
P1 · Double fault
Fils1
Van De Zandschulp2
015030153030303040
Fils1
Van De Zandschulp1
01503015301540
Fils1
Van De Zandschulp0
1503004004015
P1 · Ace
Fils5
Van De Zandschulp7
01515151530303040304040A40404040A
P3 · AceP5 · Double fault
Fils5
Van De Zandschulp6
0150300401540
Fils5
Van De Zandschulp5
015030040
Fils5
Van De Zandschulp4
15030030154015
P4 · Ace
Fils4
Van De Zandschulp4
150300301540154030404040A
P6 · Ace
Fils4
Van De Zandschulp3
15030040040154030
P2 · Ace
Fils3
Van De Zandschulp3
015030040
Fils3
Van De Zandschulp2
1503004004015
Fils2
Van De Zandschulp2
15030040040154030404040A404040A
P7 · Ace
Fils2
Van De Zandschulp1
15030040040154030
Fils1
Van De Zandschulp1
1501515153015403040
P5 · Double fault
Fils1
Van De Zandschulp0
1503003015303040304040A40
P1 · Ace
Head to head
1Fils
1Zandschulp
2 meetingsHard 0–1Clay 1–0
- Shanghai MastersRound of 32 · 12 OctHardThis matchBotic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Arthur FilsSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4
- BordeauxRound of 16 · 16 May 2024ClayArthur FilsSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
Form and path
Arthur Fils2–1
Shanghai MastersThis week
TokyoHard
Botic Van De Zandschulp2–2
Shanghai MastersThis week
BeijingHard
- LRound of 32Francisco CerundoloSets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 3
- WQualifying R2Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jie CuiSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R1Botic Van De ZandschulpSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Valentin RoyerSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.