Christian Langmo vs J J Wolf, Tulsa 2026, Quarterfinal

ITF M25 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 19 Jun

Final

Christian Langmo

LostRank #5162.9632%

Wolf won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 12–6

Set 26–4

Set 34–6

J J Wolf

WinnerRank #2161.3768%

Venue

Philcrest Hills Tennis Club

Tulsa, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

19 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

81%

Humid

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

188 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

5Aces3

4Double faults7

55Service points won50

14Service games played14

9Service games won11

14Return games played14

8/1362%Break points saved40%2/5

3/560%Break points converted38%5/13

Head to head

0Langmo

1Wolf

1 meeting

TulsaQuarterfinal · 19 JunHardThis match
J J Wolf
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Christian Langmo
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Christian Langmo vs J J Wolf, Tulsa 2026, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research