Kyle Seelig vs Philip Sekulic, Darwin 2022, Quarterfinal

ITF M25 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 16 Sept

Final

Kyle Seelig

WinnerRank #1912

Seelig won in 2 sets · 1h 28m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–1

Philip Sekulic

LostRank #338

Venue

Darwin International Tennis Centre

Darwin, AUS· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

21 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

75%

Humid

Temperature

31°C

Warm

Altitude

18 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 28m

1Aces7

2Double faults2

35Service points won32

8Service games played9

8Service games won5

9Return games played8

0/0Break points saved43%3/7

4/757%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Seelig

0Sekulic

1 meeting

DarwinQuarterfinal · 16 Sept 2022HardThis match
Kyle Seelig
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Philip Sekulic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Kyle Seelig vs Philip Sekulic, Darwin 2022, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research