Kyle Stocker vs Eugen Durnescu, Pitesti 2018, Qualifying R1

ITF M25 · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Sat 11 Aug

Final

Kyle Stocker

LostUnranked

Durnescu won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 23–6

Eugen Durnescu

WinnerUnranked

Venue

CS Comesad

Pitesti, ROU· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

11 km/h

Light

Humidity

62%

Moderate

Temperature

25°C

Warm

Altitude

299 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Stocker

1Durnescu

1 meeting

PitestiQualifying R1 · 11 Aug 2018ClayThis match
Eugen Durnescu
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kyle Stocker
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Form and path

Kyle Stocker

No recent matches recorded.

Eugen Durnescu3–3

BucharestClay

Sharm ElSheikhClay

LQualifying R1
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Eugen Durnescu
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 3

BucharestClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Kyle Stocker vs Eugen Durnescu, Pitesti 2018, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research