Maxime Authom vs Marshall Tutu, Sheffield 2016, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard · Thu 3 Nov

Final

Maxime Authom

WinnerRank #644

Authom won in 3 sets · 1h 51m

2–1

Set 13–6

Set 26–0

Set 36–2

Marshall Tutu

LostRank #1619

Venue

Graves Tennis and Leisure Centre

Sheffield, GBR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

191 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 51m

0Aces3

1Double faults6

46Service points won36

12Service games played11

9Service games won5

11Return games played12

6/967%Break points saved25%2/8

6/875%Break points converted33%3/9

Head to head

1Authom

0Tutu

1 meeting

SheffieldQuarterfinal · 3 Nov 2016HardThis match
Maxime Authom
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Marshall Tutu
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 0Set 3: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Maxime Authom vs Marshall Tutu, Sheffield 2016, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research