Daniel Glancy vs Jonas Merckx, Koksijde 2016, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 18 Aug

Final · Retired

Daniel Glancy

LostRank #1591

Merckx won · Retired · 1h 8m

0–1

Set 11–6

Set 22–5

Jonas Merckx

WinnerRank #1434

Venue

Venue not available

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Match stats

1h 8m

0Aces0

2Double faults0

21Service points won28

7Service games played7

3Service games won7

7Return games played7

5/956%Break points saved0/0

0/0Break points converted44%4/9

Head to head

0Glancy

1Merckx

1 meeting

KoksijdeRound of 16 · 18 Aug 2016ClayThis match
Jonas Merckx
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5
Daniel Glancy
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
Daniel Glancy · Retired

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Daniel Glancy vs Jonas Merckx, Koksijde 2016, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research