Patrick Ofner vs Philipp Schroll, Telfs 2016, Round of 32

FUTURES · Round of 32 · Clay · Mon 4 Jul

Final

Patrick Ofner

WinnerRank #1485

Ofner won in 2 sets · 1h 21m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–2

Philipp Schroll

LostRank #1770

Venue

Venue not available

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Match stats

1h 21m

0Aces1

0Double faults0

33Service points won29

9Service games played9

8Service games won5

9Return games played9

1/250%Break points saved56%5/9

4/944%Break points converted50%1/2

Head to head

1Ofner

0Schroll

1 meeting

TelfsRound of 32 · 4 Jul 2016ClayThis match
Patrick Ofner
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Philipp Schroll
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Patrick Ofner vs Philipp Schroll, Telfs 2016, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research