Artem Sitak vs Matthew Barton, Auckland 2016, Qualifying R1
Final score
Final
7-6(8) 6-0Venue and conditions
ASB Tennis ArenaAuckland, NZL
Outdoor hardCourt speed0.7 vs last year103.2Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 9m1Aces6
10Double faults3
40Service points won43
9Service games played9
5Service games won8
9Return games played9
2/633%Break points saved0%0/1
1/1100%Break points converted67%4/6
Head to head
0Sitak
1Barton
1 meeting- AucklandQualifying R1 · 9 Jan 2016HardThis matchMatthew BartonSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Artem SitakSets won: 0Set 1: 68Set 2: 0
Form and path
Artem Sitak3–3
Kuala LumpurHard
s HertogenboschGrass
Matthew Barton
No recent matches recorded.
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.