Artem Sitak vs Issa Shanan Al Harrasi, Doha 2015, Qualifying R1

ATP 250 · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 3 Jan

Final

Artem Sitak

WinnerRank #1161

Sitak won in 2 sets · 39m

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–1

Issa Shanan Al Harrasi

LostUnranked

Venue

Khalifa International Tennis and Squash Complex

Doha, QAT· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

1.4vs last year

Wind

15 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

72%

Humid

Temperature

25°C

Warm

Altitude

10 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

39m

7Aces0

1Double faults3

28Service points won22

7Service games played7

7Service games won2

7Return games played7

0/0Break points saved44%4/9

5/956%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Sitak

0Harrasi

1 meeting

DohaQualifying R1 · 3 Jan 2015HardThis match
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Issa Shanan Al Harrasi
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Artem Sitak vs Issa Shanan Al Harrasi, Doha 2015, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research