Michael Llodra vs Igor Sijsling, Mons Challenger 2012, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 5 Oct

Final

Michael Llodra

WinnerRank #6311.7754%

Llodra won in 2 sets · 57m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–3

Igor Sijsling

LostRank #8542.0846%

Venue

Lotto Mons Expo

Mons, BEL· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

29 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

57m

13Aces5

1Double faults3

40Service points won37

10Service games played9

10Service games won7

9Return games played10

0/0Break points saved78%7/9

2/922%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Llodra

0Sijsling

1 meeting

Mons ChallengerQuarterfinal · 5 Oct 2012HardThis match
Michael Llodra
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Igor Sijsling
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Michael Llodra vs Igor Sijsling, Mons Challenger 2012, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research