Robin Soderling vs Daniel Gimeno Traver, Valencia 2010, Round of 16

ATP 500 · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 4 Nov

Final

Robin Soderling

WinnerRank #1951.1684%

Soderling won in 2 sets · 1h 2m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–3

Daniel Gimeno Traver

LostRank #12226.2816%

Venue

L'Agora, Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias

Valencia, ESP· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

0.8vs last year

Altitude

4 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

1h 2m

5Aces7

1Double faults2

37Service points won28

9Service games played8

9Service games won5

8Return games played9

2/2100%Break points saved25%1/4

3/475%Break points converted0%0/2

Head to head

1Soderling

0Traver

1 meeting

ValenciaRound of 16 · 4 Nov 2010HardThis match
Robin Soderling
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Daniel Gimeno Traver
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Robin Soderling vs Daniel Gimeno Traver, Valencia 2010, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research