Artem Sitak vs Stanislav Poplavskyy, Moscow 2010, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-4 6-3Venue and conditions
RGUFK Tennis Centre Sireneviy4/12Moscow, RUS
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
0Sitak
1Poplavskyy
1 meeting- MoscowQuarterfinal · 2010ClayThis matchStanislav PoplavskyySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Artem SitakSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
Form and path
Artem Sitak0–6
AucklandHard
Mouilleron Le Captif CHHard
AucklandHard
MetzHard
Stanislav Poplavskyy3–3
BuchaClay
- LRound of 32Dmytro KamyninSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Stanislav PoplavskyySets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
Stanislav Poplavskyy · Retired
- WQualifying R3Stanislav PoplavskyySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Nazar AchourSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
- WQualifying R2Stanislav PoplavskyySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Sergii AntoniukSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1
ColomboHard
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.