Artem Sitak vs Jose Rubin Statham, North Shore 2009, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard

Final

Artem Sitak

WinnerRank #1161

Sitak won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 17–6⁵

Set 26–0

Jose Rubin Statham

LostRank #1038

Venue

Albany / North Harbour Tennis Park

North Shore, NZL· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

16 m

Sea level

Head to head

1Sitak

2Statham

3 meetings

North ShoreQuarterfinal · 2009HardThis match
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Jose Rubin Statham
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 0
Shanghai ChallengerRound of 32 · 3 Sept 2013Hard
Jose Rubin Statham
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 3
IpswichQuarterfinal · 2013Hard
Jose Rubin Statham
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Form and path

Artem Sitak0–6

AucklandHard

LQualifying R1
Luca Van Assche
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1

Mouilleron Le Captif CHHard

LQualifying R1
Maxime Tabatruong
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

AucklandHard

LRound of 32
Jeremy Chardy
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

ChengduHard

LQualifying R1
Michael Berrer
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 2
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 0
Artem Sitak · Retired

MetzHard

LQualifying R1
Gregoire Barrere
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

AucklandHard

LQualifying R1
Matthew Barton
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7¹⁰Set 2: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁸Set 2: 0

Jose Rubin Statham2–4

Seoul CHHard

LQualifying R1
Mukund Sasikumar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6³Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jose Rubin Statham
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 3Set 3: 4

Taipei 2 CHHard

Shenzhen Longhua CHHard

Grodzisk Mazowiecki CHHard

LQualifying R1
Iannis Miletich
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁹Set 2: 7
Jose Rubin Statham
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁷Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Artem Sitak vs Jose Rubin Statham, North Shore 2009, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research