Artem Sitak vs Izak Van Der Merwe, Mobile 2008, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard

Final

Artem Sitak

WinnerRank #1161

Sitak won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–0

Set 23–6

Set 36–4

Izak Van Der Merwe

LostRank #1965

Venue

Mobile Tennis Center / Newton Cox

Mobile, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

33 m

Sea level

Head to head

1Sitak

2Merwe

3 meetings

MobileQuarterfinal · 2008HardThis match
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 1Set 1: 0Set 2: 6Set 3: 4
Tiburon ChallengerRound of 32 · 14 Oct 2009Hard
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 1Set 3: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
Tiburon ChallengerQualifying R3 · 12 Oct 2009Hard
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3

Form and path

Artem Sitak0–6

AucklandHard

LQualifying R1
Luca Van Assche
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1

Mouilleron Le Captif CHHard

LQualifying R1
Maxime Tabatruong
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

AucklandHard

LRound of 32
Jeremy Chardy
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

ChengduHard

LQualifying R1
Michael Berrer
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 2
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 0
Artem Sitak · Retired

MetzHard

LQualifying R1
Gregoire Barrere
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

AucklandHard

LQualifying R1
Matthew Barton
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7¹⁰Set 2: 6
Artem Sitak
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁸Set 2: 0

Izak Van Der Merwe1–5

Leon CHHard

LRound of 32
Louk Sorensen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Rimouski CHHard

LRound of 32
Daniel Cox
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

SherbrookeHard

LRound of 16
Vincent Millot
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
WRound of 32
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Daniel Chu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Guangzhou Nansha CHHard

LRound of 32
Ze Zhang
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Kolkata CHHard

LQualifying R2
Liang Chi Huang
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁵Set 3: 6
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Artem Sitak vs Izak Van Der Merwe, Mobile 2008, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research