Harsh Mankad vs Stephen Mitchell, Tulsa Challenger 2006, Qualifying R3

Challenger · Qualifying R3 · Hard · Mon 25 Sept

Final

Harsh Mankad

WinnerRank #1049

Mankad won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–0

Stephen Mitchell

LostRank #1491

Venue

Philcrest Hills Tennis Club

Tulsa, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

13 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

54%

Moderate

Temperature

26°C

Warm

Altitude

188 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Mankad

0Mitchell

1 meeting

Tulsa ChallengerQualifying R3 · 25 Sept 2006HardThis match
Harsh Mankad
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Stephen Mitchell
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0

Form and path

Harsh Mankad

No recent matches recorded.

Stephen Mitchell

Tulsa CHThis week

WQualifying R1
Stephen Mitchell
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Amit Inbar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Harsh Mankad vs Stephen Mitchell, Tulsa Challenger 2006, Qualifying R3

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research