Artemon Apostu Efremov vs Adrian Ungur, Arad 2004, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Clay

Final

Artemon Apostu Efremov

WinnerRank #1376

Efremov won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–3

Adrian Ungur

LostRank #1698

Venue

Subcetate / Riviera Tennis Complex (former site)

Arad, ROU· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

112 m

Low

Head to head

1Efremov

2Ungur

3 meetings

AradSemifinal · 2004ClayThis match
Artemon Apostu Efremov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Adrian Ungur
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
BucharestQuarterfinal · 2005Clay
Adrian Ungur
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Artemon Apostu Efremov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
BucharestRound of 16 · 2005Clay
Adrian Ungur
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Artemon Apostu Efremov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Form and path

Artemon Apostu Efremov5–1

ChitilaClay

BucharestClay

WQualifying R3
Artemon Apostu Efremov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Bastian Parada
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0

Adrian Ungur3–3

Sibiu CHClay

LRound of 32
Fabrizio Ornago
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Adrian Ungur
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6²

BucharestClay

WRound of 32
Adrian Ungur
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Mihnea Lorin Stefan Turcu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2

Rome 2 CHClay

Sibiu CHClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Artemon Apostu Efremov vs Adrian Ungur, Arad 2004, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research