Adrian Ungur vs Daniel Gimeno Traver, Rome 2 2017, Round of 16
Final score
Final
7-6(5) 7-5Venue and conditions
Due Ponti Sporting ClubRome, ITA
ClayCourt speed0.7 vs last year92.0Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 56m1Aces5
3Double faults4
43Service points won53
12Service games played12
7Service games won8
12Return games played12
6/1155%Break points saved67%8/12
4/1233%Break points converted45%5/11
Head to head
0Ungur
4Traver
4 meetings- Rome 2Round of 16 · 28 Sept 2017ClayThis matchDaniel Gimeno TraverSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Adrian UngurSets won: 0Set 1: 65Set 2: 5
- CordenonsRound of 32 · 16 Aug 2016ClayDaniel Gimeno TraverSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Adrian UngurSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1
Adrian Ungur · Retired
- San Benedetto Del TrontoSemifinal · 10 Jul 2010ClayDaniel Gimeno TraverSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Adrian UngurSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
- BrasovSemifinal · 10 Sept 2005ClayDaniel Gimeno TraverSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 67Set 3: 7Adrian UngurSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 69
Form and path
Adrian Ungur3–2
Rome 2 CHThis week
Sibiu CHClay
- LSemifinalCarlos TabernerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Adrian UngurSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0
- WQuarterfinalAdrian UngurSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Stefano TravagliaSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
- WRound of 16Adrian UngurSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Marco CecchinatoSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 3
- WRound of 32Adrian UngurSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 6Ricardo Ojeda LaraSets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
Daniel Gimeno Traver
No recent matches recorded.
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.