Wayne Arthurs vs Arvind Parmar, Nottingham 2002, Quarterfinal

ATP Intl Series · Quarterfinal · Grass

Final

Wayne Arthurs

WinnerRank #3681.2873%

Arthurs won in 3 sets · 1h 46m

2–1

Set 16–7³

Set 26–2

Set 36–4

Arvind Parmar

LostRank #15073.4027%

Venue

Nottingham Tennis Centre

Nottingham, GBR· Grass

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

3.9vs last year

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

26 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 46m

26Aces17

5Double faults5

69Service points won64

15Service games played15

15Service games won12

15Return games played15

3/3100%Break points saved63%5/8

3/838%Break points converted0%0/3

Head to head

3Arthurs

0Parmar

3 meetings

Grass 2–0Clay 1–0

NottinghamQuarterfinal · 2002GrassThis match
Wayne Arthurs
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6³Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 2Set 3: 4
Roland GarrosQualifying R1 · 23 May 2006Clay
Wayne Arthurs
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 10
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6³Set 3: 8
Surbiton ChallengerRound of 32 · 2000Grass
Wayne Arthurs
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Form and path

Wayne Arthurs5–1

WimbledonGrass

Arvind Parmar2–4

Orleans CHHard

LQualifying R2
Jean-Kome Loglo
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 6⁴

US OpenHard

LQualifying R1
Robert Kendrick
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Bronx CHHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Wayne Arthurs vs Arvind Parmar, Nottingham 2002, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research