Wayne Arthurs vs Arvind Parmar, Roland Garros 2006, Qualifying R1
Final score
Final
2-6 7-6(3) 10-8Venue and conditions
Stade Roland-GarrosParis, FRA
ClayCourt speed1.0 vs last year93.5Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Head to head
3Arthurs
0Parmar
3 meetingsClay 1–0Grass 2–0
- Roland GarrosQualifying R1 · 23 May 2006ClayThis matchWayne ArthursSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7Set 3: 10Arvind ParmarSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 63Set 3: 8
- NottinghamQuarterfinal · 2002GrassWayne ArthursSets won: 2Set 1: 63Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Arvind ParmarSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 2Set 3: 4
- SurbitonRound of 32 · 2000GrassWayne ArthursSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Arvind ParmarSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.