Patrick Rafter vs Thomas Enqvist, Wimbledon 2001, Quarterfinal

Grand Slam · Quarterfinal · Grass

Final

Patrick Rafter

WinnerRank #2241.4066%

Rafter won in 3 sets · 1h 55m

3–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–3

Set 37–6⁵

Thomas Enqvist

LostRank #5482.7534%

Venue

All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club

London, GBR· Grass

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

vs last year

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

37 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 55m

15Aces6

5Double faults13

68Service points won57

14Service games played14

13Service games won9

14Return games played14

1/250%Break points saved50%5/10

5/1050%Break points converted50%1/2

Head to head

2Rafter

0Enqvist

2 meetings

Grass 1–0Clay 1–0

WimbledonQuarterfinal · 2001GrassThis match
Patrick Rafter
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Thomas Enqvist
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3Set 3: 6⁵
DusseldorfRound robin · 2001Clay
Patrick Rafter
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Thomas Enqvist
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Form and path

Patrick Rafter2–4

ATP FinalsHard

LRound robin
Andre Agassi
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Patrick Rafter
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
LRound robin
Lleyton Hewitt
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Patrick Rafter
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2
LRound robin
Sebastien Grosjean
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Patrick Rafter
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 3

US OpenHard

LRound of 16
Pete Sampras
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁵Set 4: 6
Patrick Rafter
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 2Set 3: 7⁷Set 4: 4
WRound of 32
Patrick Rafter
Sets won: 3Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Nicolas Lapentti
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6³Set 2: 2Set 3: 2
WRound of 64
Patrick Rafter
Sets won: 3Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Christophe Rochus
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2Set 3: 1

Thomas Enqvist4–2

Luxembourg CHHard

Bratislava CHHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Patrick Rafter vs Thomas Enqvist, Wimbledon 2001, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research