Thomas Enqvist vs George Bastl, Luxembourg Challenger 2005, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 26 Nov

Final

Thomas Enqvist

LostRank #548

Bastl won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 17–6⁶

Set 22–6

Set 36–7³

George Bastl

WinnerRank #953

Venue

CK Sportcenter Kockelscheuer

Luxembourg, LUX· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

300 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

1Enqvist

1Bastl

2 meetings

Luxembourg ChallengerSemifinal · 26 Nov 2005HardThis match
George Bastl
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Thomas Enqvist
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 2Set 3: 6³
Miami MastersRound of 32 · 2000Hard
Thomas Enqvist
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
George Bastl
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 6³

Form and path

Thomas Enqvist2–1

Luxembourg CHThis week

Bratislava CHHard

George Bastl

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Thomas Enqvist vs George Bastl, Luxembourg Challenger 2005, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research