Thomas Enqvist vs Lleyton Hewitt, Rome Masters 2000, Round of 16

Masters 1000 · Round of 16 · Clay

Final

Thomas Enqvist

LostRank #548

Hewitt won in 3 sets · 2h 22m

1–2

Set 16–7⁶

Set 26–2

Set 33–6

Lleyton Hewitt

WinnerRank #636

Venue

Foro Italico

Rome, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

20 m

Sea level

Match stats

2h 22m

14Aces11

3Double faults6

62Service points won68

14Service games played15

12Service games won12

15Return games played14

3/560%Break points saved70%7/10

3/1030%Break points converted40%2/5

Head to head

0Enqvist

5Hewitt

5 meetings

Clay 0–1Hard 0–4

Rome MastersRound of 16 · 2000ClayThis match
Lleyton Hewitt
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 2Set 3: 6
Thomas Enqvist
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
StockholmRound of 32 · 2002Hard
Lleyton Hewitt
Thomas Enqvist
Thomas Enqvist · Walkover
Indian Wells MastersQuarterfinal · 2002Hard
Lleyton Hewitt
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Thomas Enqvist
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
US OpenRound of 16 · 2000Hard
Lleyton Hewitt
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Thomas Enqvist
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2Set 3: 4
IndianapolisQuarterfinal · 2000Hard
Lleyton Hewitt
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Thomas Enqvist
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
AdelaideFinal · 2000Hard
Lleyton Hewitt
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Thomas Enqvist
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2

Form and path

Thomas Enqvist4–2

Luxembourg CHHard

Bratislava CHHard

Lleyton Hewitt3–3

Australian OpenHard

US OpenHard

WashingtonHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Thomas Enqvist vs Lleyton Hewitt, Rome Masters 2000, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research