John Hallquist Lithen vs Alexander Bernard, Columbia 2026, Round of 32
Final score
FinalCourt 1
6-3 6-2Venue and conditions
Carolina Tennis CenterColumbia, USACourt 1
Outdoor hardCourt speed90.4Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsOvercast
Match statistics
Final statisticsServe
0Aces0
0Double faults2
37/5567.3%First serve %73.3%33/45
18/18100.0%Second serve %83.3%10/12
27/3773.0%1st serve points won51.5%17/33
7/1838.9%2nd serve points won16.7%2/12
Return
16/3348.5%1st return points won27.0%10/37
10/1283.3%2nd return points won61.1%11/18
Break points
5Break points conversions2
Points & games
60/10060.0%Points won40.0%40/100
7/977.8%Service games won37.5%3/8
5/862.5%Return games won22.2%2/9
2Set points0
1Match points0
Momentum
7Last 10 points won3
7Point winning streak4
9Game winning streak3
Point by point
Hallquist Lithen6
Bernard2
150151530154015
Hallquist Lithen5
Bernard2
3015401540304040A40
Hallquist Lithen4
Bernard2
1501515301530303040
Hallquist Lithen4
Bernard1
015151515301540
Hallquist Lithen4
Bernard0
15030030154015
Hallquist Lithen3
Bernard0
1503004004015
P3 · Double fault
Hallquist Lithen2
Bernard0
150300400401540304040A40
Hallquist Lithen1
Bernard0
1503004004015
Hallquist Lithen6
Bernard3
1501515301530304030
Hallquist Lithen5
Bernard3
150300400
Hallquist Lithen4
Bernard3
01515153015303040304040A40
Hallquist Lithen3
Bernard3
015151530154015
P4 · Double fault
Hallquist Lithen2
Bernard3
1503004004015
Hallquist Lithen1
Bernard3
01503015301540
Hallquist Lithen1
Bernard2
1501515153030303040
Hallquist Lithen1
Bernard1
1501515153030304030404040A
Hallquist Lithen1
Bernard0
15030040040154030
Set statistics
Statistics unavailable
Point by point
Hallquist Lithen6
Bernard2
150151530154015
Hallquist Lithen5
Bernard2
Hallquist Lithen4
Bernard2
150151530153030
Hallquist Lithen4
Bernard1
015151515301540
Hallquist Lithen4
Bernard0
15030030154015
Hallquist Lithen3
Bernard0
1503004004015
Hallquist Lithen2
Bernard0
150300400401540304040A40
Hallquist Lithen1
Bernard0
1503004004015
Hallquist Lithen6
Bernard3
1501515301530304030
Hallquist Lithen5
Bernard3
150300400
Hallquist Lithen4
Bernard3
01515153015303040304040A40
Hallquist Lithen3
Bernard3
015151530154015
Hallquist Lithen2
Bernard3
1503004004015
Hallquist Lithen1
Bernard3
01503015301540
Hallquist Lithen1
Bernard2
1501515153030303040
Hallquist Lithen1
Bernard1
1501515153030304030404040A
Hallquist Lithen1
Bernard0
15030040040154030
Head to head
1Lithen
0Bernard
1 meeting- ColumbiaRound of 32 · 23 SeptHardThis matchJohn Hallquist LithenSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Alexander BernardSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
Form and path
John Hallquist Lithen5–1
SzczawnoClay
- WFinalJohn Hallquist LithenSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Linus LagerbohmSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WSemifinalJohn Hallquist LithenSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Pawel JuszczakSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0
- WQuarterfinalJohn Hallquist LithenSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6David EichenseherSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
- WRound of 16John Hallquist LithenSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Richard AntoniSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 64
- WRound of 32John Hallquist LithenSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Leonardo BorrelliSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 1
Alexander Bernard0–2
ColumbiaThis week
ChampaignHard
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.