Sumit Nagal vs Jan Choinski, Furth 2016, Qualifying R1
Final score
Final
6-4 6-1
Venue and conditions
TV 1860 Furth (Franken Challenge / Schickedanz Open)Furth, GER
Outdoor hardCourt speed3.0 vs last year91.2Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 1m2Aces1
1Double faults3
33Service points won13
9Service games played8
7Service games won3
8Return games played9
3/560%Break points saved17%1/6
5/683%Break points converted40%2/5
Head to head
2Nagal
0Choinski
2 meetingsHard 1–0Clay 1–0
- FurthQualifying R1 · 29 May 2016HardThis matchSumit NagalSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jan ChoinskiSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
- TroisdorfRound of 16 · 1 Jun 2023ClaySumit NagalJan Choinski
Jan Choinski · Walkover
- BydgoszczRound of 32 · 17 Aug 2016ClaySumit NagalSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Jan ChoinskiSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.