Bar Tzuf Botzer vs Cameron Silverman, Ramat Gan 2016, Round of 32

Final

Bar Tzuf Botzer

LostATP: 1843

Silverman won in 2 sets · 1h 41m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 23–6

Cameron Silverman

WinnerATP: 1498

Venue not available

Outdoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Data unavailable

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

28°CWarm

19km/hGentle

62%Moderate

—

Match stats

1h 41m

4Aces4

3Double faults3

35Service points won39

9Service games played10

6Service games won9

10Return games played9

6/967%Break points saved67%2/3

1/333%Break points converted33%3/9

Head to head

1Botzer

1Silverman

2 meetings

Ramat GanRound of 32 · 17 May 2016HardThis match
Cameron Silverman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Bar Tzuf Botzer
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
Ramat GanRound of 16 · 2015Hard
Bar Tzuf Botzer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Cameron Silverman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Bar Tzuf Botzer vs Cameron Silverman, Ramat Gan 2016, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research