Santiago Maresca vs Nicolas Laporte, Montauban 2014, Qualifying R2
Final score
Final
6-2 6-0Venue and conditions
Association Tennis MontaubanMontauban, FRA
ClayCourt speed92.8Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Maresca
0Laporte
1 meeting- MontaubanQualifying R2 · 2014ClayThis matchSantiago MarescaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Nicolas LaporteSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0
Form and path
Santiago Maresca2–4
Santa Margarida de MontbuiClay
VicHard
ValldoreixClay
AntalyaClay
- LQualifying R3Andrey ChepelevSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Santiago MarescaSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1
Santiago Maresca · Retired
- WQualifying R2Santiago MarescaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Lucas HellfritschSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
- WQualifying R1Santiago MarescaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Aleksa DjerkovicSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3
Nicolas Laporte2–3
MontaubanThis week
- WQualifying R1Nicolas LaporteSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Pedro MunafoSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
ReusClay
- LQualifying R2Joffrey De SchepperSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Nicolas LaporteSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0
- WQualifying R1Nicolas LaporteSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Ivan SolansSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
MontaubanClay
- LQualifying R1Damien LozanoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Nicolas LaporteSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
Mont-de-MarsanClay
- LQualifying R2Nathan MartinetSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6Nicolas LaporteSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 2
- WQualifying R1Nicolas LaporteSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Valentin MasseSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.