Temur Ismailov vs Ti Chen, Samarkand 2013, Round of 32
Final score
Final
6-3 1-6 6-3Venue and conditions
Tennis Club Dinamo, SamarkandSamarkand, UZB
ClayCourt speed6.2 vs last year98.1Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 56m4Aces2
0Double faults1
39Service points won50
12Service games played13
7Service games won8
13Return games played12
3/838%Break points saved62%8/13
5/1338%Break points converted63%5/8
Head to head
1Ismailov
2Chen
3 meetingsClay 0–1Hard 1–1
- SamarkandRound of 32 · 14 May 2013ClayThis matchTi ChenSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 6Temur IsmailovSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
- AndijanFinal · 28 May 2016HardTemur IsmailovSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7Set 3: 7Ti ChenSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 5
- BangaloreRound of 32 · 19 Oct 2015HardTi ChenSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Temur IsmailovSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.