Rudy Coco vs Xander Spong, Frinton 2010, Round of 16
Final score
Final
7-5 6-0Venue and conditions
Frinton-on-Sea Lawn Tennis ClubFrinton, GBR
GrassCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Coco
0Spong
1 meeting- FrintonRound of 16 · 2010GrassThis matchRudy CocoSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Xander SpongSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 0
Form and path
Rudy Coco1–5
PoitiersHard
Saint-DizierHard
- LRound of 32Thomas Le BoulchSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 7Rudy CocoSets won: 1Set 1: 65Set 2: 6Set 3: 64
ToulouseHard
- LRound of 32Tallon GriekspoorSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7Rudy CocoSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
LilleHard
- LFinalKaren KhachanovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Rudy CocoSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
- WSemifinalRudy CocoSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 60Set 3: 7Quentin HalysSets won: 1Set 1: 64Set 2: 7Set 3: 67
Xander Spong2–4
AmstelveenClay
- LQualifying R2Alessandro RicciSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Xander SpongSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R1Xander SpongSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Louis Van HerckSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
HeraklionHard
- LQualifying R2Christian HirschmuellerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Xander SpongSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1
- WQualifying R1Xander SpongSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Sebastian GrauSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
BolClay
- LQualifying R1Manfred FellinSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Xander SpongSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
OldenzaalClay
- LQualifying R2Stephan GerritsenSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Xander SpongSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.