Philippe Frayssinoux vs Clinton Lee, Montauban 2004, Qualifying R1
Final score
Final
6-0 6-1Venue and conditions
Association Tennis de Montauban — former Aussonne groundsMontauban, FRA
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Frayssinoux
0Lee
1 meeting- MontaubanQualifying R1 · 2004ClayThis matchPhilippe FrayssinouxSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Clinton LeeSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 1
Form and path
Philippe Frayssinoux0–6
GrasseClay
- LRound of 32Thomas PaireSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Philippe FrayssinouxSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1
AngersClay
- LRound of 32Sebastien De ChaunacSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Philippe FrayssinouxSets won: 0Set 1: 68Set 2: 4
Jersey CHHard
AlbufeiraHard
- LRound of 32Alexandre FolieSets won: 2Set 1: 67Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Philippe FrayssinouxSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 4
Lagos (Portugal)Hard
- LRound of 32Thomas SchoorelSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 10Philippe FrayssinouxSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 5
FaroHard
- LRound of 32Guillermo AlcaideSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Philippe FrayssinouxSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
Clinton Lee1–3
Geneva CHClay
- LQualifying R2Bertrand ContzlerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Clinton LeeSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 1
- WQualifying R1Clinton LeeSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Kazuhito OshimaSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
SzolnokClay
- LRound of 32Zoltan BoroczkySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Clinton LeeSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2
Pozoblanco CHHard
- LQualifying R1Domenic MarafioteSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Clinton LeeSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.