Nathan Zeder vs Conner Murnigham, Champaign 2001, Qualifying R1
Final score
Final
7-5 6-4Venue and conditions
Atkins Tennis CenterUrbana, USA
Indoor hardCourt speed101.7Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
Altitude231 mLow
Head to head
1Zeder
0Murnigham
1 meeting- ChampaignQualifying R1 · 24 Nov 2001HardThis matchNathan ZederSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Conner MurnighamSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4
Form and path
Nathan Zeder1–2
Tyler CHHard
Conner Murnigham
No recent matches recorded.
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.