Raphael Perot vs Amit Vales, Champaign 2026, Round of 32
Venue and conditions
Atkins Tennis CenterUrbana, USA
Indoor hardCourt speed101.7Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
Altitude231 mLow
Player comparison
Raphael PerotAmit Vales
#406 → #384Ranking, last 12 months#880 → #471
- #384
- Ranking
- #471
- #294
- Career high
- #471
- 41–26
- 2026 record
- 45–24
- 17–13
- 2026 on hard
- 39–18
- 7
- Titles
- 2
- 25
- Age
- 21
- —
- Height
- 173 cm
- —
- Plays
- Right
Head to head
First meetingRaphael Perot and Amit Vales haven’t played each other on the recorded tours.
Form and path
Raphael Perot4–2
ColumbusHard
- WSemifinalRaphael PerotSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Bor ArtnakSets won: 0Set 1: 64Set 2: 3
- WQuarterfinalRaphael PerotSets won: 2Set 1: 64Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Victor LilovSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 5Set 3: 4
- WRound of 16Raphael PerotSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Michael AntoniusSets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
- WRound of 32Raphael PerotSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Preston StearnsSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
HarlingenHard
Amit Vales5–1
MontrealHard
HeraklionHard
- WFinalAmit ValesSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Cezar CretuSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- WSemifinalAmit ValesSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Ioannis XilasSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 4
- WQuarterfinalAmit ValesSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Julio Cesar PorrasSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 3
- WRound of 16Amit ValesSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Odysseas GeladarisSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Ranking points at stake
Perot#384 · 130 ptsVales#476 · 97 pts0points defending here0
Next 8 weeks with Pro
ATP rankings breakdown, Nov 9
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.