Bor Artnak vs Eli Stephenson, Columbus 2026, Round of 32
Final score
Final
6-1 7-5Venue and conditions
Ty Tucker Tennis CenterColumbus, USA
Indoor hardCourt speed96.2Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
Altitude225 mLow
Set statistics
Final statisticsService
6Aces2
1Double faults7
Return
13/4033%1st serve return points20%7/35
29/4466%2nd serve return points52%13/25
5Break points converted1
Points
82Total points won62
40Service points won42
42Receiver points won20
6Max points in a row5
Games
8Service games won5
5Max games in a row2
Point by point
Artnak7
Stephenson5
1501515153015403040404040A4040A404040A40
Artnak6
Stephenson5
150300400
Artnak5
Stephenson5
1501515153030303040404040A4040A40404040A4040A40404040A404040A
Artnak5
Stephenson4
150300400
Artnak4
Stephenson4
01515153015303040304040A40404040A
Artnak4
Stephenson3
1501515153030304030404040A4040A40
Artnak3
Stephenson3
015030040
Artnak3
Stephenson2
15015153015303040304040A40
Artnak2
Stephenson2
1501515153030304030404040A404040A404040A4040A40
Artnak1
Stephenson2
015030153030303040
Artnak1
Stephenson1
150300301530303040404040A
Artnak1
Stephenson0
015151530154015
Artnak6
Stephenson1
150300301540154030
Artnak5
Stephenson1
015151530154015
Artnak4
Stephenson1
150300400
Artnak3
Stephenson1
0151515301530304030
Artnak2
Stephenson1
015030040
Artnak2
Stephenson0
0150301530303040304040A404040A404040A40
Artnak1
Stephenson0
150300400
Head to head
1Artnak
0Stephenson
1 meeting- ColumbusRound of 32 · 11 NovHardThis matchBor ArtnakSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Eli StephensonSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 5
Form and path
Bor Artnak5–1
HarlingenHard
- WFinalBor ArtnakSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Connor Henry Van SchalkwykSets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
- WSemifinalBor ArtnakSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Kaylan BigunSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
- WQuarterfinalBor ArtnakSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Hunter HeckSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5
- WRound of 16Bor ArtnakSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Tomasz BerkietaSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 1
Eli Stephenson4–2
IthacaHard
LexingtonHard
- LSemifinalJack AnthropSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Eli StephensonSets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 4
- WQuarterfinalEli StephensonSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Noah ZamoraSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
- WRound of 16Eli StephensonSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Nicolas ArseneaultSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0
- WRound of 32Eli StephensonSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Michael Bassem SobhySets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.