Paul Jubb vs Matt Ponchet, Sheffield 2026, Round of 16
Final score
Final · Retired
5-7 7-6(6)
Venue and conditions
Graves Tennis and Leisure CentreSheffield, GBR
Indoor hardCourt speed103.3Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
Altitude189 mLow
Set statistics
Final statisticsService
6Aces8
2Double faults3
67/8777%1st serve %59%53/90
18/2090%2nd serve %92%34/37
46/6769%1st serve points won72%38/53
10/2050%2nd serve points won49%18/37
3/560%Break points saved73%8/11
12Service games played12
Return
15/5328%1st serve return points31%21/67
19/3751%2nd serve return points50%10/20
3/1127%Break points converted40%2/5
Points
90Total points won87
56Service points won56
34Receiver points won31
Games
10Service games won9
Point by point
Unavailable
Point history unavailable
Head to head
0Jubb
1Ponchet
1 meeting- SheffieldRound of 16 · 28 OctHardThis matchMatt PonchetSets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 7Paul JubbSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 66
Form and path
Paul Jubb4–1
SheffieldThis week
RedbridgeHard
- LFinalOliver TarvetSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6Paul JubbSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 2
- WSemifinalPaul JubbSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Patrick BradySets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 67
- WQuarterfinalPaul JubbSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 7Hugo GrenierSets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 65
- WRound of 16Paul JubbSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Roan JonesSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- WRound of 32Paul JubbSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Patrick FoleySets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
Matt Ponchet1–4
SheffieldThis week
SarregueminesCarpet
PlaisirHard
Roehampton 2 CHHard
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.