Patrik Munkhammar vs Fanming Meng, Norman 2026, Qualifying R2
Final score
Final
6-1 6-4Venue and conditions
Gregg Wadley Tennis PavilionNorman, USA
Outdoor hardCourt speed7.0 vs last year91.0Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsClear
Head to head
1Munkhammar
0Meng
1 meeting- NormanQualifying R2 · 27 OctHardThis matchPatrik MunkhammarSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Fanming MengSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
Form and path
Patrik Munkhammar3–3
GentofteClay
- LQuarterfinalIvan IvanovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Patrik MunkhammarSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
- WRound of 16Patrik MunkhammarSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Samuel RovaiSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 3
- WRound of 32Patrik MunkhammarSets won: 2Set 1: 0Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Fryderyk Lechno WasiutynskiSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 2
VärnamoClay
Fanming Meng2–4
Zhangjiagang CHHard
MaanshanHard
MaanshanHard
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.