Timo Legout vs Daniel De Jonge, Sioux Falls 2026, Qualifying R1
Final score
FinalStadium 1
7-6(6) 6-2Venue and conditions
Huether Family Match PointeSioux Falls, USAStadium 1
Indoor hardCourt speed2.3 vs last year99.0Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksAltitude431 mModerate
Set statistics
Final statisticsService
1Aces6
2Double faults10
37/6359%1st serve %44%34/77
24/2692%2nd serve %77%33/43
26/3770%1st serve points won68%23/34
17/2665%2nd serve points won44%19/43
3/560%Break points saved56%5/9
10Service games played10
Return
11/3432%1st serve return points30%11/37
24/4356%2nd serve return points35%9/26
4/944%Break points converted40%2/5
10Return games played10
Points
78Total points won62
43Service points won42
35Receiver points won20
7Max points in a row4
Games
13Games won8
8Service games won6
5Max games in a row4
1Tiebreaks0
Point by point
Legout6
De Jonge2
1503004004015
P2 · Double fault
Legout5
De Jonge2
015151530154015
Legout4
De Jonge2
0150301530303030404040A40404040A
P2 · AceP6 · Double faultP7 · Double faultP8 · AceP9 · Ace
Legout4
De Jonge1
0150301530303030404040A40404040A4040A40
Legout3
De Jonge1
0150300401540
Legout3
De Jonge0
150151530154015
Legout2
De Jonge0
0150301530303030404040A40
Legout1
De Jonge0
150300400
Legout7
De Jonge6
0111212232334344455565667686
P8 · Ace
Legout6
De Jonge6
0151515153030304030
Legout5
De Jonge6
01503015301540
Legout5
De Jonge5
1501515301530304030
P1 · Ace
Legout4
De Jonge5
150300301530304030404040A4040A40404040A
P1 · Double faultP9 · Double fault
Legout4
De Jonge4
015030153015403040
P4 · Double fault
Legout4
De Jonge3
1501515153015403040
P2 · Ace
Legout4
De Jonge2
015030040
P1 · Double fault
Legout4
De Jonge1
15030030154015
P4 · Double fault
Legout3
De Jonge1
150300400
Legout2
De Jonge1
0151515301530303040404040A
Legout2
De Jonge0
150300400
Legout1
De Jonge0
0151515301540154030
P2 · Double faultP3 · Double faultP4 · Double fault
Head to head
1Legout
0Jonge
1 meeting- Sioux FallsQualifying R1 · 25 OctHardThis matchTimo LegoutSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Daniel De JongeSets won: 0Set 1: 66Set 2: 2
Form and path
Timo Legout3–3
Fort Worth CHHard
San Diego 2 CHHard
- LSemifinalIgor MarcondesSets won: 2Set 1: 65Set 2: 7Set 3: 7Timo LegoutSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 5Set 3: 5
- WQuarterfinalTimo LegoutSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7Set 3: 7Tristan BoyerSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 5
- WRound of 16Timo LegoutSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Colton SmithSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
Daniel De Jonge3–3
Roanne CHHard
ForbachCarpet
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.