Karl Poling vs Maxwell Exsted, Sioux Falls Challenger 2026, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sun 25 Oct

FinalStadium 1

Karl Poling

WinnerRank #4531.5759%

Poling won in 2 sets · 1h 17m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–2

Maxwell Exsted

LostRank #8882.2541%

Venue

Huether Family Match Pointe

Sioux Falls, USA· Hard· Stadium 1

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

431 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Moderate

Set statistics

Final statistics

Service

1Aces10

1Double faults3

34/5364%1st serve %63%40/64

18/1995%2nd serve %88%21/24

26/3476%1st serve points won75%30/40

13/1968%2nd serve points won21%5/24

3/3100%Break points saved75%9/12

9Service games played8

Return

10/4025%1st serve return points24%8/34

19/2479%2nd serve return points32%6/19

3/1225%Break points converted0%0/3

8Return games played9

Points

68Total points won49

39Service points won35

29Receiver points won14

6Max points in a row5

Games

12Games won5

9Service games won5

3Max games in a row1

Poling6

Exsted2

0151515153030304030

Poling5

Exsted2

150151530154015

Poling4

Exsted2

0151515301540154030

Poling3

Exsted2

01503004015403040

Poling3

Exsted1

1503004004015

Poling2

Exsted1

15015153015303030404040A40

Poling1

Exsted1

1501515153015403040404040A4040A404040A40

Poling0

Exsted1

150151515301540

Head to head

1Poling

0Exsted

1 meeting

Sioux Falls ChallengerQualifying R1 · 25 OctHardThis match
Karl Poling
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Maxwell Exsted
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Form and path

Karl Poling1–5

Fort Worth CHHard

LQualifying R1
Alex Rybakov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Karl Poling
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

AustinHard

Mouilleron Le Captif CHHard

LQualifying R1
Patrick Zahraj
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Karl Poling
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2

Saint Tropez CHHard

Maxwell Exsted3–3

LexingtonHard

LRound of 32
Jack Anthrop
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Maxwell Exsted
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

Tiburon CHHard

LQualifying R1
Luca Staeheli
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Maxwell Exsted
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 3

AsuncionClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Karl Poling vs Maxwell Exsted, Sioux Falls Challenger 2026, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Set statistics

Service

Return

Points

Games

Point by point

Head to head

Form and path

Match research