Sandro Kopp vs Samuele Pieri, Florence Challenger 2026, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 22 Oct

FinalCampo Centrale

Sandro Kopp

WinnerRank #3081.5759%

Kopp won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 15–6

Set 26–3

Set 36–4

Samuele Pieri

LostRank #3122.2541%

Up next · Quarterfinal · Florence CHKopp vs Alex Marti Pujolras—

Venue

Match Ball Firenze Country Club

Bagno a Ripoli, ITA· Clay· Campo Centrale

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

4 km/h

Calm

Humidity

62%

Moderate

Temperature

20°C

Mild

Altitude

59 m

Low

Set statistics

Final statistics

Service

4Aces7

4Double faults1

59/9363%1st serve %56%54/96

30/3488%2nd serve %98%41/42

41/5969%1st serve points won63%34/54

19/3456%2nd serve points won62%26/42

7/978%Break points saved73%8/11

15Service games played14

Return

20/5437%1st serve return points31%18/59

16/4238%2nd serve return points44%15/34

3/1127%Break points converted22%2/9

14Return games played15

Points

96Total points won93

60Service points won60

36Receiver points won33

6Max points in a row6

Games

16Games won13

13Service games won11

5Max games in a row3

Kopp6

Pieri4

150300400

Kopp5

Pieri4

015030040

Kopp5

Pieri3

1501515153015403040

Kopp5

Pieri2

0150300401540

Kopp5

Pieri1

015030153030304030

Kopp4

Pieri1

0151515301540154030

Kopp3

Pieri1

1501515301530304030

Kopp2

Pieri1

150300301530303040

Kopp2

Pieri0

150300301530304030

Kopp1

Pieri0

0150301530303030404040A404040A404040A40

Head to head

1Kopp

0Pieri

1 meeting

Florence ChallengerRound of 16 · 22 OctClayThis match
Sandro Kopp
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Samuele Pieri
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 4

Form and path

Sandro Kopp0–5

Florence CHThis week

WRound of 32
Sandro Kopp
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Gianluca Cadenasso
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6²Set 2: 1

Catania CHClay

LRound of 32
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Sandro Kopp
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6³Set 3: 1

Palermo CHClay

LRound of 32
Jonas Forejtek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Sandro Kopp
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4

Genoa 2 CHClay

LRound of 32
Dali Blanch
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sandro Kopp
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Tulln CHClay

LRound of 32
Matias Soto
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Sandro Kopp
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 2

Como CHClay

LRound of 32
Norbert Gombos
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sandro Kopp
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Samuele Pieri3–2

Florence CHThis week

WRound of 32
Samuele Pieri
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Miguel Damas
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 2

Olbia CHHard

LRound of 32
Daniel Rincon
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Samuele Pieri
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2

Palermo CHClay

LRound of 32
Martin Krumich
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Samuele Pieri
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 4

Bari CHClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Sandro Kopp vs Samuele Pieri, Florence Challenger 2026, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Set statistics

Service

Return

Points

Games

Point by point

Head to head

Form and path

Match research