Darwin Blanch vs Daniel Milavsky, Fort Worth Challenger 2026, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 21 Oct

FinalCourt V5

Darwin Blanch

WinnerRank #1441.5062%

Blanch won in 2 sets · 1h 12m

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–4

Daniel Milavsky

LostRank #3122.5038%

Venue

Bayard H. Friedman Tennis Center

Fort Worth, USA· Hard· Court V5

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

3 km/h

Calm

Humidity

30%

Comfortable

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

198 m

Low

Set statistics

Final statistics

Service

6Aces5

4Double faults3

31/5457%1st serve %55%31/56

19/2383%2nd serve %88%22/25

29/3194%1st serve points won68%21/31

10/2343%2nd serve points won44%11/25

2/2100%Break points saved50%3/6

9Service games played8

Return

10/3132%1st serve return points6%2/31

14/2556%2nd serve return points57%13/23

3/650%Break points converted0%0/2

8Return games played9

Points

59Total points won47

39Service points won32

24Receiver points won15

6Max points in a row6

Games

12Games won5

9Service games won5

5Max games in a row1

Blanch6

Milavsky4

15030030154015

Blanch5

Milavsky4

15015151530154030404040A40

Blanch4

Milavsky4

015030153030304030

Blanch3

Milavsky4

015030040

Blanch3

Milavsky3

150300400

Blanch2

Milavsky3

015030153030303040404040A

Blanch2

Milavsky2

1501515153030303040404040A4040A404040A40

Blanch1

Milavsky2

015030040

Blanch1

Milavsky1

150151530154015

Blanch0

Milavsky1

15015151530303030404040A40404040A

Head to head

2Blanch

0Milavsky

2 meetings

Fort Worth ChallengerRound of 16 · 21 OctHardThis match
Darwin Blanch
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Daniel Milavsky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
Columbus ChallengerRound of 16 · 30 SeptHard
Darwin Blanch
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 6
Daniel Milavsky
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

Form and path

Darwin Blanch3–2

Fort Worth CHThis week

WRound of 32
Darwin Blanch
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Albert Pedrico Kravtsov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

Columbus CHHard

San Diego 2 CHHard

Daniel Milavsky1–4

Fort Worth CHThis week

WRound of 32
Daniel Milavsky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Govind Nanda
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Columbus CHHard

San Diego 2 CHHard

LRound of 32
Timo Legout
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6⁵Set 3: 6
Daniel Milavsky
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 2

Tiburon CHHard

LRound of 32
Federico Agustin Gomez
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Daniel Milavsky
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6²Set 3: 2

US OpenHard

LQualifying R1
Shintaro Mochizuki
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Daniel Milavsky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Darwin Blanch vs Daniel Milavsky, Fort Worth Challenger 2026, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Set statistics

Service

Return

Points

Games

Point by point

Head to head

Form and path

Match research