Kimmer Coppejans vs Dane Sweeny, Shanghai Masters 2026, Qualifying R2

Masters 1000 · Qualifying R2 · Hard · Tue 6 Oct

Final

Kimmer Coppejans

WinnerRank #2222.2042%Upset

Coppejans won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–2

Dane Sweeny

LostRank #1121.6158%

Venue

Qizhong Forest Sports City Tennis Center

Shanghai, CHN· Hard· Court 4

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

0.2vs last year

Wind

7 km/h

Light

Humidity

50%

Moderate

Temperature

20°C

Mild

Altitude

6 m

Sea level

Set statistics

Final statistics

Service

4Aces0

2Double faults4

43/6566%1st serve %65%36/55

20/2291%2nd serve %79%15/19

32/4374%1st serve points won61%22/36

8/2236%2nd serve points won32%6/19

3/475%Break points saved20%1/5

9Service games played8

Return

14/3639%1st serve return points26%11/43

13/1968%2nd serve return points64%14/22

4/580%Break points converted25%1/4

8Return games played9

Points

67Total points won53

40Service points won28

27Receiver points won25

6Max points in a row4

Games

12Games won5

8Service games won4

5Max games in a row2

Coppejans6

Sweeny2

015030153030304030

Coppejans5

Sweeny2

0150301530303030404040A40

Coppejans4

Sweeny2

015030153030303040

Coppejans4

Sweeny1

01503015301540

Coppejans4

Sweeny0

15015151530303030404040A40

Coppejans3

Sweeny0

015151530154015

Coppejans2

Sweeny0

1503004004015

Coppejans1

Sweeny0

1501515301530303040404040A4040A40

Head to head

1Coppejans

0Sweeny

1 meeting

Shanghai MastersQualifying R2 · 6 OctHardThis match
Kimmer Coppejans
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Dane Sweeny
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Form and path

Kimmer Coppejans1–4

Shanghai MastersThis week

WQualifying R1
Kimmer Coppejans
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7¹⁰Set 2: 6
Nishesh Basavareddy
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁸Set 2: 3

Genoa 2 CHClay

Seville CHClay

LRound of 32
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Kimmer Coppejans
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

Porto CHClay

LRound of 32
Thiago Monteiro
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kimmer Coppejans
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2

US OpenHard

LQualifying R1
Jurij Rodionov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kimmer Coppejans
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Dane Sweeny2–3

Shanghai MastersThis week

WQualifying R1
Dane Sweeny
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Tristan Schoolkate
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2

Jingshan CHHard

HangzhouHard

LRound of 32
Taro Daniel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 6
Dane Sweeny
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 2

US OpenHard

LRound of 32
Luciano Darderi
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Dane Sweeny
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Kimmer Coppejans vs Dane Sweeny, Shanghai Masters 2026, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Set statistics

Service

Return

Points

Games

Point by point

Head to head

Form and path

Match research