Olaf Pieczkowski vs Hugo Coquelin, Ann Arbor 2026, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 2 Oct

Final · RetiredCourt 1

Olaf Pieczkowski

LostRank #7181.3669%

Coquelin won by retirement · 1h 25m

1–0

Set 16–5⁰

Hugo Coquelin

WinnerRank #12953.0031%Upset

Venue

Varsity Tennis Center

Ann Arbor, USA· Hard· Court 1

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

58%

Moderate

Temperature

17°C

Mild

Altitude

277 m

Low

Match statistics

Final statistics

Serve

0Aces0

1Double faults0

26/3476.5%First serve %62.0%31/50

7/887.5%Second serve %100.0%19/19

15/2657.7%1st serve points won54.8%17/31

5/862.5%2nd serve points won36.8%7/19

Return

14/3145.2%1st return points won42.3%11/26

12/1963.2%2nd return points won37.5%3/8

Break points

2Break points conversions2

Points & games

46/8454.8%Points won45.2%38/84

4/666.7%Service games won50.0%3/6

3/650.0%Return games won33.3%2/6

1Set points0

0Match points0

Momentum

5Last 10 points won5

6Point winning streak4

2Game winning streak2

Pieczkowski6

Coquelin5

015030153030304030404040A4040

Pieczkowski6

Coquelin5

150300301540154030

Pieczkowski5

Coquelin5

150300400

Pieczkowski4

Coquelin5

1501515153030303040404040A

Pieczkowski4

Coquelin4

150300301540154030404040A404040A4040A40404040A

Pieczkowski4

Coquelin3

150300400

Pieczkowski3

Coquelin3

15030040040154030404040A404040A

Pieczkowski3

Coquelin2

150300301530304030

Pieczkowski2

Coquelin2

150300400

Pieczkowski1

Coquelin2

01503015301540

Pieczkowski1

Coquelin1

150300301530304030404040A404040A

Pieczkowski1

Coquelin0

1503004004015

Head to head

0Pieczkowski

1Coquelin

1 meeting

Ann ArborQuarterfinal · 2 OctHardThis match
Hugo Coquelin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5⁰
Olaf Pieczkowski
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁷

Form and path

Olaf Pieczkowski1–3

Ann ArborThis week

Columbia, ScHard

Grodzisk Mazowiecki CHHard

LRound of 32
Mathys Erhard
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Olaf Pieczkowski
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 5Set 3: 1

AstanaHard

LRound of 32
Dan Brand
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Olaf Pieczkowski
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Hugo Coquelin1–2

Ann ArborThis week

RoehamptonHard

AldershotHard

LQuarterfinal
Ronald Hohmann
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Hugo Coquelin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Olaf Pieczkowski vs Hugo Coquelin, Ann Arbor 2026, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match statistics

Serve

Return

Break points

Points & games

Momentum

Point by point

Head to head

Form and path

Match research