Yannik Kelm vs Tom Sickenberger, Wetzlar 2026, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
7-6(0) 6-0Venue and conditions
TC Wetzlar 1912Wetzlar, GERShow Court 8
ClayCourt speed0.1 vs last year88.9Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 46m0Aces2
4Double faults5
22Service points won38
9Service games played9
2Service games won5
9Return games played9
4/1136%Break points saved43%3/7
4/757%Break points converted64%7/11
Set statistics
Statistics unavailable
Point by point
Kelm0
Sickenberger6
015030040
Kelm0
Sickenberger5
150151515301540
Kelm0
Sickenberger4
01503015301540
Kelm0
Sickenberger3
015030040
Kelm0
Sickenberger2
015030040
Kelm0
Sickenberger1
0151515153015403040404040A404040A404040A
Kelm6
Sickenberger7
01020304050607
Kelm6
Sickenberger6
150151530154015
Kelm5
Sickenberger6
0151515153030303040
Kelm5
Sickenberger5
015030153030304030404040A
Kelm5
Sickenberger4
1501515153030304030404040A4040A40
Kelm4
Sickenberger4
015030040
Kelm4
Sickenberger3
015030153030304030
Kelm3
Sickenberger3
0151515153030304030
Kelm2
Sickenberger3
015151515301540
Kelm2
Sickenberger2
1501515153030303040
Kelm2
Sickenberger1
15015151530154030404040A40404040A4040A40404040A4040A40
Kelm1
Sickenberger1
150300301530303040404040A
Kelm1
Sickenberger0
0151515301530304030
Head to head
0Kelm
1Sickenberger
1 meeting- WetzlarQuarterfinal · 31 JulClayThis matchTom SickenbergerSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Yannik KelmSets won: 0Set 1: 60Set 2: 0
Form and path
Yannik Kelm3–1
WetzlarThis week
MetzingenClay
- LSemifinalPatrick ZahrajSets won: 2Set 1: 62Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Yannik KelmSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 2
- WQuarterfinalYannik KelmSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Johan NiklesSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5
- WRound of 16Yannik KelmSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6David EichenseherSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
- WRound of 32Yannik KelmSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6John Hallquist LithenSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
Tom Sickenberger0–3
WetzlarThis week
- WRound of 16Tom SickenbergerSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Neo NiednerSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 66
- WRound of 32Tom SickenbergerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jesse De JagerSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
- WQualifying R2Tom SickenbergerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Emil RastSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- WQualifying R1Tom SickenbergerSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Sil HollemansSets won: 0Set 1: 64Set 2: 5
UslarClay
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.