Maximo Nagele vs Oriol Font, Xativa 2026, Qualifying R1

ITF M15 · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Sun 26 Jul

Final

Maximo Nagele

LostUnranked

Font won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 20–6

Oriol Font

WinnerRank #2205

Venue

Club de Tenis Camp Bixquert

Xativa, ESP· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

19 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

36%

Comfortable

Temperature

32°C

Hot

Altitude

148 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Nagele

1Font

1 meeting

XativaQualifying R1 · 26 JulClayThis match
Oriol Font
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Maximo Nagele
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0

Form and path

Maximo Nagele3–3

DeniaClay

LQualifying R2
Alvaro De Miguel Montero
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 10
Maximo Nagele
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 3

Roda de BaraHard

GetxoClay

Oriol Font

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Maximo Nagele vs Oriol Font, Xativa 2026, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research