Bryce Nakashima vs Noah Zamora, San Diego 2026, Semifinal

ITF M15 · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 4 Jul

Final

Bryce Nakashima

WinnerRank #576

Nakashima won in 2 sets · 24m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–4

Noah Zamora

LostRank #758

Venue

Barnes Tennis Center

San Diego, USA· Hard· Court 11

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

72%

Humid

Temperature

25°C

Warm

Altitude

5 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

24m

4Aces1

1Double faults0

39Service points won31

10Service games played9

10Service games won7

9Return games played10

5/5100%Break points saved33%1/3

2/367%Break points converted0%0/5

Head to head

1Nakashima

0Zamora

1 meeting

San DiegoSemifinal · 4 JulHardThis match
Bryce Nakashima
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Noah Zamora
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Bryce Nakashima vs Noah Zamora, San Diego 2026, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research