Daniel Siniakov vs Leonardo Rossi, Marburg 2026, Round of 16

ITF M25 · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 2 Jul

Final

Daniel Siniakov

WinnerRank #496

Siniakov won in 2 sets · 1h 52m

2–0

Set 17–5

Set 26–1

Leonardo Rossi

LostRank #528

Venue

TV 1965 Marburg

Marburg, GER· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

23 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

62%

Moderate

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

181 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 52m

8Aces4

6Double faults2

52Service points won28

10Service games played9

9Service games won5

9Return games played10

4/580%Break points saved43%3/7

4/757%Break points converted20%1/5

Head to head

1Siniakov

0Rossi

1 meeting

MarburgRound of 16 · 2 JulClayThis match
Daniel Siniakov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Leonardo Rossi
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Daniel Siniakov vs Leonardo Rossi, Marburg 2026, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research