Felix Einig vs Tim Hammes, Marburg 2026, Qualifying R2
Final score
Final
4-6 7-6(5) 10-5Venue and conditions
TV 1965 MarburgMarburg, GERCourt 5
ClayCourt speed2.3 vs last year93.1Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
2h 6m2Aces6
2Double faults2
52Service points won51
11Service games played11
9Service games won8
11Return games played11
3/560%Break points saved25%1/4
3/475%Break points converted40%2/5
Set statistics
Statistics unavailable
Point by point
Einig5
Hammes10
1020213132333444454647485859510
Einig6
Hammes7
011112132324253536465657
Einig6
Hammes6
15030030154015
Einig5
Hammes6
015030040
Einig5
Hammes5
0150300401540
Einig5
Hammes4
150300301530304030
Einig4
Hammes4
01515151530303040304040A404040A40
Einig3
Hammes4
015030040
Einig3
Hammes3
15030030154015
Einig2
Hammes3
015030040
Einig2
Hammes2
015030153030304030
Einig1
Hammes2
0151515153015403040404040A
Einig1
Hammes1
150300400
Einig0
Hammes1
015030153015403040
Einig6
Hammes4
1501515301530304030404040A404040A4040A404040A404040A40
Einig5
Hammes4
01503015301540
Einig5
Hammes3
1503004004015
Einig4
Hammes3
0150301530303030404040A404040A40
Einig3
Hammes3
1503004004015
Einig2
Hammes3
150151530154015
Einig1
Hammes3
15015151530303040304040A40
Einig0
Hammes3
0151515301530303040
Einig0
Hammes2
015030040
Einig0
Hammes1
1501515153030303040
Head to head
0Einig
1Hammes
1 meeting- MarburgQualifying R2 · 30 JunClayThis matchTim HammesSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 10Felix EinigSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 65Set 3: 5
Form and path
Felix Einig0–1
MarburgThis week
Tim Hammes
No recent matches recorded.
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.