Jesse De Jager vs Sander Jong, Alkmaar 2026, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 26 Jun

Final

Jesse De Jager

WinnerRank #14655.4017%Upset

Jager won in 2 sets · 1h 24m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–3

Sander Jong

LostRank #3961.1383%

Venue

TPC Alkmaar

Alkmaar, NED· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

18 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

70%

Humid

Temperature

35°C

Hot

Altitude

0 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 24m

1Aces2

1Double faults0

37Service points won28

9Service games played9

7Service games won4

9Return games played9

7/978%Break points saved50%5/10

5/1050%Break points converted22%2/9

Head to head

1Jager

0Jong

1 meeting

AlkmaarQuarterfinal · 26 JunClayThis match
Jesse De Jager
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sander Jong
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jesse De Jager vs Sander Jong, Alkmaar 2026, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research