Hiroki Moriya vs Kuan Yi Lee, Maanshan 2026, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 19 Jun

Final

Hiroki Moriya

WinnerRank #480

Moriya won in 3 sets · 3h 8m

2–1

Set 17–6⁵

Set 24–6

Set 36–4

Kuan Yi Lee

LostRank #654

Venue

ROGT Sports Event Center

Ma'anshan, CHN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

13 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

3h 8m

3Aces4

7Double faults4

60Service points won56

16Service games played16

10Service games won10

16Return games played16

3/933%Break points saved45%5/11

6/1155%Break points converted67%6/9

Head to head

1Moriya

0Lee

1 meeting

MaanshanQuarterfinal · 19 JunHardThis match
Hiroki Moriya
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Kuan Yi Lee
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Hiroki Moriya vs Kuan Yi Lee, Maanshan 2026, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research