Spencer Johnson vs Neo Niedner, Irvine 2026, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 19 Jun

Final

Spencer Johnson

WinnerRank #4361.2378%

Johnson won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 27–5

Neo Niedner

LostRank #16794.3322%

Venue

Racquet Club of Irvine

Irvine, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

72%

Humid

Temperature

23°C

Warm

Altitude

21 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

11Aces0

2Double faults7

47Service points won45

11Service games played10

11Service games won8

10Return games played11

2/2100%Break points saved83%10/12

2/1217%Break points converted0%0/2

Head to head

1Johnson

0Niedner

1 meeting

IrvineQuarterfinal · 19 JunHardThis match
Spencer Johnson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Neo Niedner
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Spencer Johnson vs Neo Niedner, Irvine 2026, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research